<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>emotion &#8211; GoldSRD</title>
	<atom:link href="https://goldsrd.com/tag/emotion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://goldsrd.com</link>
	<description>Internal audit training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:48:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">215964374</site>	<item>
		<title>The Impact of Emotional Communication, Part II</title>
		<link>https://goldsrd.com/impact-emotional-communication-part-ii/</link>
					<comments>https://goldsrd.com/impact-emotional-communication-part-ii/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Goldberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 05:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peoplecentric]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.goldsrd.com/?p=2984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last week, we introduced the scenario of an emotionally charged discussion on political rhetoric. Here were our three choices: Discuss my thoughts and opinions on the subject and get into most likely an ugly conversation/argument Agree with everything she said (placate her) and continue on in a conversation that grating on me Tell her that [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, we introduced the scenario of an emotionally charged discussion on political rhetoric. Here were our three choices:</p>
<ul>
<li>Discuss my thoughts and opinions on the subject and get into most likely an ugly conversation/argument</li>
<li>Agree with everything she said (placate her) and continue on in a conversation that grating on me</li>
<li>Tell her that it is best that I walk away from the conversation and talk to her the next day</li>
</ul>
<p>I choose the last option, walking away from a conversation that (a) was only going to get worse if I chose to engage and (b) no matter what I said to her, she would never change her mind because she is one of those people (“she is always right”). Additionally, we were friendly but I did not have a significant emotional investment in the relationship. Due to that, I chose the last option so I would not have a significant conflict but did hope to spare the friendship. After walking away, I went upstairs to my room to check some emails and prepare for the next day. I preceded to receive four or five emotionally filled texts from her, stating how immature I was and how I embarrassed her by walking away from her. Now, if she would have just dropped the subject, I would have moved on and we could have salvaged our professional friendship. After the texts, we actually did not see each other the rest of the conference. I received another text a few days later of a similar nature to the previous texts. Due to that, I decided not to respond. Was this the right decision? What are your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://goldsrd.com/impact-emotional-communication-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2984</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
